labourlords.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the labourlords.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host labourlords.org.uk. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Tiggee LLC .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

optional email code keep in touch or login with: twitter facebook login > optional email code login > about about frontbench staff labour peers blog contact us lords business scrutiny communicating engagement campaigning debate labour peers legislation get in touch latest from our blog dianne hayter speech in the house of lords, monday 23rd july 2018 it would be churlish not to welcome the appearance of the white paper – albeit a year after needed, since it has to be reflected in the “political declaration” of the withdrawal agreement. but, my lords, it’s a white paper: unacceptable to two cabinet ministers who’d agreed it; unacceptable to the eu who’ve rubbished it; unacceptable to the government, which accepted erg amendments that undermined it; unacceptable to much of industry, the city and business; unacceptable - i imagine - to this house, unacceptable to the commons without dup votes, lib dem no-shows, a handful of rogue labour votes and some dubious government whipping; and unacceptable to the opposition, being grounded on a flawed facilitated customs arrangement, an absence of migration clarity; inadequate plans for services, and failure to guarantee the good friday agreement. apart from that, it’s probably a runner! why so unacceptable? first, it’s based on a fallacy. second, it’s devised to satisfy a divided conservative party rather than satisfy uk plc. thirdly, because some think talk of “no deal” will somehow bring everyone on board. yet pretending to threaten a no deal – which would cost households £1,000 and see an 8% drop in gdp (twice this in the north east) – is nonsensical if the conservatives ever want to win an election again, as crashing the economy would never be forgiven not just by workers and consumers, but by business, the city and manufacturing, which have traditionally trusted the tories to manage the economy in the national interest. borrowing the words of a former prime minister from the party which took us in to europe, and who herself wanted the single market: no, no, no! no deal is not an option – so stop being diverted by it. trade deals for all the positives (common rulebook, a role for the ecj, a catalogue of issues raised by our eu committee), the white paper is based on a fallacy: that there are profitable, exciting markets across the globe currently closed to us, but would magically open the moment we left the eu. the notion we’re leaving in favour of some wondrous us trade deal better than what we have with our nearest, 500 million-strong, market (as well as the 57 with whom we share agreements) just doesn’t hold water. it is a fantasy that we 60 million can negotiate better than the eu’s half a billion. indeed trade policy experts think our status as a supplicant means we will struggle to secure good deals, especially from the us, china and india. furthermore, we face a highly protectionist president – witness his “america first” rhetoric. a president who is: unleashing trade wars with china, the eu, canada and mexico; filed five wto complaints against trading partners, and even queried the wto; and imposed import tariffs [2] on solar panels, washing machines, steel and aluminium. and what does he want from the uk? given he claims the eu – a “foe” – has treated the us “unfairly”, he wants more access to our market, not opening their market to us. it’s “a predatory policy towards brexit britain .. designed to take advantage of [our] .. need for trade deals.” he wants america to sell us more: agriculture, and cars (liam fox offering to reduce tariffs on us cars, which will hardly help our automotive industry!). trump isn’t interested in a deal if we maintain eu standards, saying the prime minister had "probably killed" hopes of a deal by staying close to these. business what of business? the cbi president said that, without a customs union, “sectors of manufacturing .. risk becoming extinct”. and following chequers, over 100 entrepreneurs and business leaders wrote that: “the cost, complexity and bureaucracy created by crashing out of the customs union and adopting alternative arrangements is the last thing that .. businesses need as we seek to grow and employ more people.” your lordships have often heard from airbus, rolls royce, freight transport and others. but one new example is uk publishing, the world’s largest exporter of books with a third going to the eu. the publishers association fears brexit could damage this as "it's not just tariffs … it's the non-tariff barriers, customs checks and delays. that means .. books sat in a customs warehouse in calais rather than in a bookshop in dusseldorf." services services are even more alarmed. not only as it’s often impossible to distinguish goods from services, as complex manufactured products (aircraft engines and cars) combine servicing, design, it, training and marketing into the physical components which get screwed together. even more, banking, medicine, leisure, law, accountancy, it comprise 80% of our economy, and an even higher proportion of employment, their healthy trade surplus helping offset a deficit on manufactures and agriculture. yet services drew the short straw in the white paper causing alarm to financial organisations and companies who describe this as a “real blow for the uk’s financial and related professional services”. the financial sector had anticipated a deal based on “mutual recognition”, with the eu accepting that their and our financial regulations were equally robust. the city was therefore deeply disappointed that this was abandoned in favour of “expanded” equivalence which is patchy, unilateral and makes us subject to ‘third country’ regime. the white paper itself admits we “will not have current levels of access” to eu markets, yet is vague on how services, and millions of jobs, will be protected, and our competitive advantage not shipped to new york or the continent. europe and what do our partners think? the plan has yet to find favour with the commission, which insists that the four freedoms are indivisible. added to which, we only seem to want eu’s most talented citizens, apparently putting the rest in the queue with koreans and others. the commission doubts the facilitated customs arrangement could be made to work, and has yet to be convinced we’ve sorted the irish border. public as for the public, only 13% think the pm is handling brexit well, 75% judging she’s making a mess of it. well, they’re right about that! and it’s not just remainers. the labour brexiteer, john mills, reckons “negotiations .. could hardly have been worse handled”. indeed, he goes further and says “it is not clear that there is now a good brexit solution available to us.” yesterday’s poll makes hard reading for the government. they must know that the more they pretend no deal is viable, the harder it will be to sell a negotiated deal as satisfactory. so all their dancing around a band of irreconcilable anti-europeans itself undermines navigating a realistic way forward. labour for labour, the absence of a deal for services is a major shortcoming. this isn’t a “nice to have” add on, but key for our future prosperity. and both for ireland, and across all borders, the facilitated customs drivel is simply impractical. it cannot check the safety of food, composition of manufactured goods to assure compliance with rules of origin, let alone the imposition and allocation of tariffs or vat. conclusion my lords, the truth is that the prime minister is stranded in a mire of her own making. she tried to escape the clasp of the erg, only to retreat at the first whiff of gunfire. she must now complete the task of facing them down, move away from their impossibilist demands, discard red or blue lines and step towards the majority opinion in parliament – indeed along the lines labour has long sketched out – embracing a customs union and a single market deal. the pm must unite the commons and the country by prioritising the economy, jobs, agriculture and the

URL analysis for labourlords.org.uk

http://www.labourlords.org.uk/speech_on_government_s_brexit_negotiations_preparations
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/users/twitter/connect?page_id=1
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/#m_-4154558639664818356__ftn1
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/about
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/antiques_rogue_show
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/#menu
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/staffteam
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/elections_info
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/labour_peers
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/current_business
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/login
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/contact_us
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/contact_us
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/frontbenchteam
http://www.labourlords.org.uk/blog
labour.org.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
labourlords.org.uk

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 15-Jun-2016

Registrar:
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 17-Feb-2012
Expiry date: 17-Feb-2019
Last updated: 10-Feb-2018

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns10.nationbuilder.com
ns11.nationbuilder.com
ns12.nationbuilder.com
ns13.nationbuilder.com

WHOIS lookup made at 06:00:28 31-Jul-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS labourlords.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

SPONSOR
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk
Relevant dates:

  CREATED 17-Feb-2012

  CHANGED 10-Feb-2018

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS10.NATIONBUILDER.COM 208.94.148.4

  NS11.NATIONBUILDER.COM 208.80.124.4

  NS12.NATIONBUILDER.COM 208.80.126.4

  NS13.NATIONBUILDER.COM 208.80.125.4

  NAME labourlords.org.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .